Yes the question posed in the title to this post may sound absurd to some, but go with me for a second… the other night for no apparent reason I pulled up “Husband” from Shirley’s second release for Elektra. 1988’s A Woman’s Point of View and after listening a few things immediately sprung to mind:

1. The keyboard wizardry of Billy Beck of Ohio Players fame is all over this track, he is a co-writer of not only “Husband” but “As We Lay” from Shirley’s 1986 eponymous outing. But whereas “As We Lay” was more theatrical and somewhat traditional in its construction, “Husband” was something altogether different for that time period. “Husband” was another in the lineage of the synthesis of sanctified and secular music. If you think about the music that was contemporary to “Husband” nothing in the secular music world sounded anything like this production. The intro to “Husband” was so good it feels like it served up some inspiration for another evergreen R&B gem – SWV’s “Weak” which would appear four years later.

2. The strongest representation for my argument that this song ushered in 90’s R&B is the chorus of “Husband”. The chord progression that Billy Beck utilizes here has served as the foundation for many a Gospel and R&B tune. But more than that checkout how Shirley’s background vocals are arranged and the interplay between the backgrounds and her lead. I’m not going to name any names, but there are a lot of R&B/Soul artists that debuted in the early to mid- 90’s that quite honestly were completely cut from the template of the “Husband” production. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, it’s just I don’t know if enough people know about the influence and that’s problematic.

3. As I stated earlier “Husband” was something different. Often what happens when the music shifts is there are the pioneering productions that don’t get all the accolades, shifts in music can be very subtle, so quite often it seems like the right folks listen to the shifts and incorporate the changes to wider acclaim.

I really believe that this production falls into the category of pioneering. I’m not advancing “Husband’s” legacy as earth-shattering but just trying to provide some context as to the fact that songs that were contemporaries did not sound like “Husband” and that after the debut of “Husband” many borrowed from its production style. So, I guess my answer to the question posed is yes. Perhaps. What are your thoughts?